30 Aug, 2010 | by
Richard Vinhais

The following article is an extension of The Resilient Consultant (Part 1 of 2): Five Steps to bounce back from failure. It’s a logical spin-off to cover what I believe to be an extremely vital topic, which will most assuredly help you obtain some perspective. It will provide five key steps to minimizing future engagement failures and protect your personal brand in the process. I’d like to point out that these steps go beyond a standard methodology for managing an engagement. There are plenty of materials out there that cover that space, so you won’t find that here. What you will find are proactive steps an individual can take across the full range of the sales life cycle, from pursuit to execution, that better position him or her for success.
However, just like any other methodology, the following guidance will not guarantee that you never encounter a bad engagement again. In fact, I suggest that you accept the absolute certainty that you will be confronted with bad engagements at some point, so please save yourself the suspense. Some of the most dramatic personal growth I’ve achieved in my career has come directly from bad projects. Don’t be afraid of the challenge; embrace it. Just be mentally prepared to take on anything and get ready to adapt.
The real value from this piece comes from helping consultants understand that they do have some control over their destiny. I say “some” because there are certain elements that are quite frankly outside of anyone’s control, such as client timing and resource availability. But by melding the following guidance into your existing professional routine, it will help avoid engagement difficulties, and increase the likelihood of overall engagement success. If your goal is to achieve some semblance of longevity in your professional services career, please take these steps seriously. Although a few of the steps may appear to be “common sense” at face value, the old adage of “common sense does not always equate to common practice” could not be a more apt description.
continue reading »
18 Aug, 2010 | by
Sanjeev Kumar

In the last few weeks some of my friends and colleagues have been very busy debating the global economic situation and trying to figure out where we are heading. GO Figure! Eh…. I so wish I could help them and had answers to all their questions. But then on a second thought no harm in trying…. right?
Let us look at the last few months to get a good handle of where we are, shall we? To begin with I must say if we look at the events unfolding in the last couple of months there was no dull moment and it has been an action-packed rollercoaster ride which has kept us busy and entertained but this depends on how you look at it.
Shall we do a quick RECAP and look at some of the HIGHLIGHTS of the past few months? continue reading »
11 Apr, 2010 | by
Sanjeev Kumar

A friend of mine once told me Positive Attitude is the MANTRA for success.
Now some may say being positive is good but one has to be a REALIST too. Isn’t that just COMMON SENSE or maybe not. I believe human psychology plays a very important part in whatever we do as humans. And I do mean everything relationship, business, career etc.
Let us explore this more shall we?
Most of us who operate in the market or just watch the market have witnessed the markets going UP on bad news and vice-versa. And sometimes the strength of these irrational or unexpected moves will make you want to lose all your foresight, judgement, wisdom and commonsense. You will be tempted to abandon your own view and just follow the trend. There are some who do follow the trend. And there is nothing wrong with that. You don’t need to beat the market consensus but just profit from it. But sometimes bucking against the market consensus does pay well in the end. We all know that the markets have a habit of getting either too optimistic or too pessimistic and this has a lot to do with the market psychology. continue reading »
30 Mar, 2010 | by
Richard Vinhais

A close friend and colleague of mine, Mehdi Farhadi, recently dropped me a line to say hello. He simultaneously passed along one of his recent publications and asked if I’d be willing to share it on mybusinessmusings.com. Without hesitation, I said YES. You see, Mehdi epitomizes what it means to be a guru in the field of mergers & acquisitions. While working together in Germany, back in 2008, on a major global transaction we frequently pontificated and debated various M&A concepts. Strangely enough, it was a field of interest we instantly bonded on. I vividly recall one particular discussion, which revolved around organic vs. inorganic organizational growth. It was one of those pleasant conversations where we 100% agreed on all fronts. Ironically enough, several years later, Mehdi has put together a great piece that took that discussion to a whole new level. This article will actually appear as a chapter in a book he will be releasing in the near future called “Value in Due Diligence”. Give it a read as the perspective is invaluable. I especially love the chart he’s put together as it really tells a significant story. Enjoy everyone and thanks for sharing Mehdi:
Business leaders strive for growth. Growth is essential to the well-being of companies. According to Ansoff (1957), “just to retain its relative position, a business firm must go through continuous growth and change.” Most companies consider external growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) – both asset and share deals - as one of the quickest ways to fulfil business growth objectives. Corporate marriages help companies to sustain profit growth and gain greater market share. continue reading »
28 Feb, 2010 | by
Richard Vinhais

My heart was beating through my chest, and my mind racing. The same thought kept replaying over and over again within my cerebral cortex: “I’m not prepared for this meeting. How did I allow myself to get into this situation”? After my colleague and I entered the client’s palatial office, I calmly sat down and distributed the packet of information that we would be reviewing. I was confident with the early part of the presentation but was struck with an escalating sense of foreboding as the conversation progressed. His eyes said it all, but his words would remove any doubt: “I was expecting something very different. I am now stuck in the unenviable position of having to make a difficult decision…Either postpone tomorrow’s board meeting, yet again, or trust that this presentation will be properly fixed by tomorrow morning”. His comments, coupled with my senior colleague’s less than stellar support, shook me to my very core. I was thrown under the proverbial bus, and I knew there was no coming back from it. Less than two weeks into a new engagement, I was surreptitiously rolled off the client. Just like that…I was done.
Never in my career had I experienced such a profound sense of failure and anger, in both myself and the project’s leadership team. I cannot put into words just how deeply my confidence had been shaken. In many cases, a consultant’s effectiveness is directly tied to his ability to exude confidence. Had I lost my Mojo? Had my personal brand been tarnished? How could I recover from something like this? continue reading »
4 Feb, 2010 | by
Sanjeev Kumar

Although the economists still can’t agree on the real quantative impact of various stimulus packages that were adopted by economies from around the world but one cannot dispute the fact that the size of the stimulus did matter and did work in most cases.
To investigate this further let us look at the various stimulus packages that were adopted during the CRISIS.
Obviously by the sheer size and percentage of National GDP China’s US $ 586 billion stimulus Package which accounts for above 12.9% its GDP stands out from the REST. It is possibly followed by Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and the mother of all STIMULUS thrown by United States under its American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 which is the largest by any measures (US$ 787 billion).
At the time there were market pundits who were debating the pros and cons and some even doubted if the stimulus packages will deliver and I am glad to admit that some of us including myself had a different view. Based on my judgement and commonsense I concluded in a piece that I wrote in March of 2009 titled “ Getting the Patient Out of Intensive – The Economy “ that it should deliver and put the US and the world economy back to growth. But having said we should have no illusion that the road ahead is still bumpy and uncertain. continue reading »
31 Jan, 2010 | by
Richard Vinhais

I tend to shy away from politically focused posts as the feedback is generally overly intense, sometimes irrational and usually futile. It’s almost as bad as trying to discuss the perennially hot topic of religion. The discussion always begins amicably enough, but it inevitably seems to devolve into senseless argument. I think Oscar Wilde said it best: “Arguments are to be avoided; they are always vulgar and often convincing”.
After watching the recent State of the Union address (embedded below; please watch it if you have not…It’s worth it) I felt compelled to share a few thoughts, given that much of the focus of the speech is centered on the economy. A harsh reality is that politics and business are firmly joined at the hip, whether you want to believe that or not. A clear example of this would be the special bond between corporate entities and career politicians. How many times have you heard of “gray-area” reciprocities that have transpired over the past few decades alone? You know what I mean – transactions that just didn’t seem to pass the common sense test. Remember the cozy relationship between Halliburton and former Vice President Dick Cheney? Wiki “Political scandals of the United States,” and you’ll get a flavor of just how extensive the list is.
I know, I know … you’re probably thinking I’m heading down the path of “all politicians are criminals” stereotype. That’s really not my intention here, so please bear with me. We all know that political malfeasance is much more commonplace then it should be. When was the last time you had that following thought running through your head after news of a scandal broke: “Wow, I can’t believe he or she would do something like that”? It’s almost expected these days. The only questions are: “How egregious is the act?” and “Will the public ultimately accept the indiscretion for what it was?” It’s that simple; however, variables that dictate the public’s appetite for forgiveness is not. Blagojevich = Bad, Clinton = Not so bad or even good. Go figure. continue reading »
10 Jan, 2010 | by
Richard Vinhais

By now, you probably know a friend or a friend of a friend who has seen the blockbuster movie “Avatar,” a film that undoubtedly touts the creative genius of James Cameron, with a plot that seems to be universally appreciated, visually stunning cinematography and cutting-edge 3D technology that puts the proverbial cherry on top. Anecdotally, it just seems that moviegoers are actually excited about going to theaters again, a trend of which Hollywood is keenly aware.
As the “Avatar”-sparked 3D revolution continues to build momentum, I find myself asking a profoundly simple question: Is it sustainable? 3D has been around for a very long time. Yes, the technology itself has evolved in tremendous ways, but the original concept goes back over fifty years, not to mention there have been 3D resurgences in both the 50s and 80s. However, the spikes in usage during those periods were seen as gimmicks that quickly lost popularity.
In the January 6, 2010 Yahoo News article “Blockbuster ‘Avatar’ to accelerate 3D revolution”, the author states that “[a]ccording to organizers of a recent 3D film festival in Belgium, more than 150 3D films are currently in various stages of production. Among them is the long-awaited movie adaptation of comic-book hero ‘Tintin,’ directed by Oscar-winner Steven Spielberg and tentatively scheduled for release in 2011.”
It’s clear that Hollywood sees the current 3D revolution as an opportunity to accentuate the moviegoer experience and glean profits in the process. But I for one feel that the 3D zeitgeist will pass and ultimately succumb to one irrefutable principle: Technology without substance or meaningful content is destined for failure.
continue reading »
17 Aug, 2009 | by
Richard Vinhais

(Photo: Adam Lyon)
About a year ago, I was strongly considering the pursuit of an executive MBA to compliment my existing advanced degree in technology management. I had been on the fence about the decision for quite some time. Part me of felt as though my education would be that much more enhanced with the addition of those three little letters to bolster my resume. Another part of me just felt as though I had unfinished business from several years prior. You see, my graduate degree was comprised of about 1/3 of the standard MBA curriculum so I theoretically could have declared a dual degree approach. But I didn’t. At the time it just didn’t make much sense. I had just landed a new job as a consultant and I knew my time would be very limited moving forward.
As I revisited the possibility of heading back to school, an executive MBA was the only thing that might be able to comport with my hectic work schedule. I decided to attempt to obtain firm sponsorship so my tuition fees would covered. Unfortunately I didn’t make the cut as only 1 out of a little over 2o applicants received sponsorship. This was at the height of our economic downward spiral so the outcome really didn’t surprise me at the time. Trying to obtain firm sponsorship was even more challenging then the actual executive MBA application itself. Not only did I need to provide a completed application that I’d be providing to the university I was applying to, but there were also series of other internal applications and recommendations I needed to provide. It was an extremely painful process.
As you could imagine, the process left me with a number of completed applications; including my precious essays which would sadly never see the light of day. Rather then cast them into the abyss of my My Documents folder, I felt that it might be helpful to some if I shared a sample essay response to one of the most commonly asked MBA admission essay questions. The hope is that my personal style to the essay may help spark new ideas to help enhance your own response, and ultimately increase your chances of getting into the school of your dreams. To be clear, this is not an approval to plagiarize the essay. Writing an MBA essay for admissions is a profoundly personal activity. It should reflect who you are, and not what you think the admission’s committee would like to hear.
The following is one of the most commonly asked MBA admission essay questions: Why are you an ideal candidate for the Executive MBA Program and how will your professional and personal accomplishments benefit your EMBA colleagues? continue reading »
9 Jul, 2009 | by
Sanjeev Kumar

Developing countries’ share of global equity market capitalization jumped to a record 24 % in the first half of 09 from the past levels of 15% at the start of 07 as more investors flock attracted by the growth story.
Investors are now beginning to realize that developed nations are possibly faced with decades of very low growth and may need decades to work off the mountain of debt which is the biggest since World War II. According to IMF recent forecast the total debt of developed nations used to fund various bank bailouts and stimulus packages could reach above 113% of GDP by 2014. This is more then three times the estimated forecast of 34% for developing nations. Though one could argue that developed countries have had bigger debt burden in the past ( post World War II ) reaching close to 250% of GDP in case of U.K., and over 100% in case of USA but these debts were repaid pretty quickly. On the other hand, we have to take into account that developed nations recorded decades of high growth just after the World War II ended which allowed them to get their fiscal house in order. In the current circumstances it is highly unlikely that the developed economies will see growth levels of post World War II era going forward.
Developed countries are in a catch-22 situation if they spend more to keep stimulating the economy they risk running into a huge unsustainable fiscal deficit. The combination of low growth and ballooning budget deficit could be very damaging to developed economies. The talk of the town is now increasingly focused on getting the fiscal deficit under control. It looks like the Governments in the developed world have resigned to the fact that they are entering into a low growth era. World Bank is now forecasting the GDP of high-income countries to shrink by over 4.2% in 09 and the overall global economy to contract by 2.9% in 2009. continue reading »